Search Amici
I hope not to hurt anyone, but I think it's worth to be read
So I received and so the ride.
> Archaeology. He studied Oriental languages \u200b\u200bat the University of Jerusalem
> Hebrew, Aramaic, and greek. His recent books: the Bible, words, secrets,
> Mysteries "and" Return the old Mass, "Gabrielli always publisher. His
> letter complaint against the bishops, the church, the best interests, the
> governance, the exploitation of children, do not know why 'but it is unlikely you will have'
> news of this letter on the various official bodies, then let's turn
> us ....
>
>
> Open Letter to Cardinal Bagnasco
>
> Dear Mr. Cardinal,
>
> live in the same city and we belong to the Church herself: her bishop,
> I am a priest. She is also head of the Italian bishops, sharing 50% between
> Genoa and Rome. In Genoa it is said that she is not much involved in the life of
> Rome diocese, and probably will say the same in reverse. E '
the> fate of traveling salesmen and a percentage of the cardinals. With this
> public document, I turn to 50% of the cardinal who is the President
> of the CEI, but even 50% of which is the cardinal bishop of Genoa because
> choices of the first to fall directly affecting the people of His
> city.
> I read his inaugural address at the 59th General Assembly of the CEI (24-29
> May 2009) and also his press conference on May 29, 2009. He
> hit the delicacy, as if the trouble which he has dealt with - or rather not
> dealt with - the moral (or immoral?) That invests in our country
> Because of the conduct of the Prime Minister, now proved in
> unequivocally: habitual minors, on perjury
> children, use of falsehood as an instrument of government, planning
> lie on the media under control, such as slander political struggle.
> You and the Secretary of the IEC have toned down the words to dilute in
> broth drinkable even by novices in a convent. Yet the accusations are
> serious and reliable sources: the wife's husband publicly accused President
> of the board of "minors attend," states that must be treated
> "like a sick man," describes him as "the dragon which must be offered virgin
> in sacrifice." The interviews published by one (sic) newspaper
> Italian desert dell'omertà of everyone else and nearly all
> foreign press, confirmed beyond any doubt that the President of
> board has lied the nation and continues to lie about
> its judicial processes, sull'inazione of his government and its
> pedophilia. A decree of a court of first instance has certified that he is
> corruptor of witnesses called to court and use the lie as a tool
> ordinary life and government. Yet prides itself on the Catholic moral
> God, Country, Family. In a compliant TV has turned into his private
> in a public affair to use it for electoral purposes, without any
> retaining ethical and institutional.
> you, Mr. Cardinal, presents the teachings of the bishops (and the pope) as
> guarantor of moral, centered on the person and family values,
> but neither she nor the bishops have said a word about a man unequivocal,
> Head of Government , which led our people to the lowest level of
> moral degradation, enhancing the instincts of seduction, strength / smarts and
> selfishness individual. The bishops attending the country's moral decay
> blind and mute, unvoiced, buried in a fog of incense, which prevents them
> to see the 'truth' that is the stark "reality." Your attitude is
> recidivist because you used the same language with harmless rejections
> immigrants in violation of all the dictates of law and ethics and
> of the Social Doctrine of the Catholic Church, with which the government is usually
> gargle to your satisfaction and your joke. You
> done a blizzard against cohabitation (I say) and safeguards attached,
> you did fail in a referendum in the name of the highest "principles do not
> negotiable" and now you have nothing else to say except that your little words
> have "for all", that is for anyone.
> The people of faith and believing otherwise is divided into two categories:
> bewildered and resigned. The first do not understand why you have not spared
> slapped all'integerrimo and practicing Catholic, Prof. Romano Prodi,
> while carrying out any immorality of Berlusconi. Do not perhaps acquittal
> have, where you strive to point out that in the field of ethics you "spoken to
> all"? This blank expression I can not mention individually
> some and save the goat of the general moral (ie, immorality) and
> cabbage substantial interests that are involved: in the same
> interview she made the request for increased funding for
> private schools, paying for itself in relation to the two facts. And 'maybe a
> warning that unless there's funding, you are ready to
> download the current majority government that stands under
> Catholic vote atheists? Many began to leave the Church and to devote
> 8xmille the other religions: I am sure you know that the cheapest
> the Catholic Church continued to decline, must, however, know that it is a
> direct result of the CEI for the nonexistent teaching that has changed
> Prophecy in diplomacy in servility, and the truth.
> resigned Catholics are even worse because it concluded that if the
> bishops did not condemn Berlusconi and Berlusconi, then it is not
> and pass over serious allegations of pedophilia, sexual lifestyles
> harem embedded method of government based on lies, on lies and
> hatred of the opponent but to win at all costs. Catholics the
> Catholic voters and women vie for a model of corruption, whose
> TV and newspapers morally unscrupulous deform our people with
> "TV model" despicable, immoral and quarrelsome.
> In the eyes of our people, you, the Bishops silent, you are jointly responsible
> and accomplices, who is blamed or, even worse, try to belittle
> the scope of personal responsibility. The people have coded this
> offense with the saying is as a thief who steals because those who hold out your bag. Why
> parades in the sack Berlusconi and his most foul? Why not
> raise your voice to say that our people are a people from the tv addict,
> 50% of personal property and for the other 50% under the direct influence
> of Prime Minister? Why not say a word about conflict of interest
> that is crushing the legality and the fundamental ethos of our country?
> Why do you continue to fornicate with an immoral man who preaches the values \u200b\u200b
> Catholic family and then divorced, remarried, divorced again and
> surrounds of minors to amuse his senile svirilità? Why not
> say that such men have nothing in common as believers, as
> pastors and as guarantor of Catholic morality? Why do not you
> disavowed when it rejected the immigrants be handed over to certain death?
> It is not the same man who made a decree to save at least the
> Eluana of plant life? Are not you the same people who defend the
> life "from its beginning to its natural end"? The life of blacks
> worth less than that of a white? Up to this point have been
> infected by the heresy of the League and Berlusconi? Why not say that
> Catholics who support him in any way, and are jointly responsible
> accomplices of his crimes that natural ethics conviction? How
> that distant time of St. Ambrose to Theodosius in 390 prevented from entering
> in the cathedral of Milan because "even the Emperor and the Church, not to
> above the Church." You honor a golden calf.
> I and, I believe, many other believers think that she and the bishops have
> lost your authority and you are denied because your teaching
> act of self-interest and not for truth. For expediency, not gospel. A
> sink and a majority government, a slave master who has
> huge amounts of capital from "iniquitatis mammon", it was willing to
> weld all economic demand on the principle that every man and
> institution have their price. The promise includes your silence
> which - it must be said - silence is golden? When your silence
> ignominy does not hold evidence of the facts, you, the experts, weigh the
> words and talk to as daughter-mother-in-law seeks, but without disturbing
> too, "truncate, ... quell quell, truncate '.
> Mr. Cardinal, remembers his uncle of the Betrothed? "See your
> fatherhood; Some things, like I said to her, from among ourselves finirsi from
> buried here, stirring things too ... do worse. She knows what
> follows: quest'urti, these spades, starting sometimes a trifle, and
> go ahead, go ahead ... to find the bottom, or if it becomes
> head, They come out and cents' other scams. Soothe, truncate, father very
> Reverend: truncate, quell '(A. Manzoni, The Betrothed, chap. IX). We must
> think that the accusations of pedophilia to the Chairman of the lies and
> country to try to be a "trifle" for they lose enough 'five
> Pater, Ave and Gloria "? The situation was described as fierce and
> offensive to you by the former President of the Republic, Francesco Cossiga,
> that you have not refuted: "The Church has a very important behavior
> private. But in a monogamous devout [read: Prodi] that challenges some of his
> directives and spoils a female instead gives a real hand, the Church
> says spoils the good girls. Ecclesia et meretrix caste "(La Stampa,
> 08/05/2009).
> Allow me to recall to his memory, a step of a Father of
> Church, the upright Saint Hilary of Poitiers, which already in sec. IV put in
> guard by flattery and gifts from the Emperor Constantius, the Berlusconi
> Caesars of turn: "We no longer have an anti-Christian emperor there
> prosecuted, but we must fight against a persecutor even more insidious,
> an enemy that flatters; lashes back there but I caressing the belly
> not confiscate our goods (thus giving us life), but it enriches us to give us
> death, urges us not to freedom by putting us in prison but towards the
> slavery inviting and honoring the palace, there affects the body, but
> takes possession of the heart; there cuts the head with the sword, but it kills
> soul with money "(Hilary of Poitiers, against the Emperor Constantius 5).
> Dear Mr. Cardinal, in the name of the God she claims to represent,
> give us a taste of prophecy, a whisper of gospel, a flash of summer
> coherence of faith and credibility. If you can not do 50% attributable to the
> President of the CEI 'best interests to "do it at least 50% of
> jurisdiction of the bishop of a city where many, many people are
> away from the life of the Church because of the moral elasticity of
> Italian bishops based on the principle of opportunism that is the negation
> truth and connective tissue of civil society.
> You mentioned "educational emergency" that is also the theme proposed for the
> next decade and has complained about "negative models of television."
I suppose> you to know that the TV does not come under the Arch of Titus, but have a
> owner who is head of government and conditions in the double role
> programs, advertising, economy, models and styles of life, ethics and
> behavior of young people who can not offer more than the prospect
> the "vellum" or in the alternative Member of Parliament directly under the
> leader who lavishes places in the parliament as a loyalty bonus to those who
> proves more helpful, especially for women. They say the news that the
> Sultan has gloat in front of his reaction because he feared worse,
> if he says that he is an expert, I can believe. Now with the blessing
> your tickling, may continue in its enterprise and lascivious
> in trafficking in minors to be sacrificed on the altar of the temple of his
> paranoid narcissism, for the benefit of the country Berlusconistan like
> British press Italy has called.
> Dear Mr. Cardinale, we can still hope that the bishops exercise
> service of their authority with authority, without alchemy covering
> of the rich and powerful against the clarity of truth as taught
> John the Baptist cries all'Erode duty without fear
his own> life: "Do not Licet"? Precursor to his words of conviction cost him his life,
> while you your "silent" for good luck.
>
> Looking forward to your reply Best regards.
>
> Genoa May 31, 2009
>
> Paolo Farinella, priest
0 comments:
Post a Comment