between two vendors, the Italians have chosen the original. It does not say so in your book edited by Mario and Michael Prospero Morcellini - ( Why the left has lost the election? "), But almost . On page 74, for example, states that Vel-thrones "contributed to the customization, the presidenzializzazione and media coverage of-competition. "The Party" leaderizzato "and"-centered on the candidates rather than on the program, tried in vain to defeat Berlusconi with the same weapons of Berlusconi. So the illusion of 'mayor' s Italy, with its nuovismo-down (read Democratic Party), has sbricio-lated under the blows of the "timber" (the quotes sa-rebbero Massimo D'Alema, according to the gossip-awareness through the press, that whisper of a tele-used a hairdryer with President Cossiga in which the former Minister for Foreign Affairs a few days before the vote preconiz-ing the slaughter of the center). D'Alema and it is not to miss yet another production editorial on the reasons of the crisis at the left-left, to walk with the usual polite irrive veltroniana-ence on the rubble of utopia. The PD, however, is not a project wrong, but explains D'Ale-university students of the Faculty of Communication Sciences of La Sapienza University in Rome. Sem-ever was the wrong assumption, "the claim of self-sufficiency by forming alliances to win (no Di Pietro, level - he says - is" completely mirrors Berlusconi), the idea of \u200b\u200bcompetition can do a glance Custom-ised and bipartisan fact, even if no longer fed by anti berlu-sconismo (if anything in the A-Berlusconi, that indifference to the opponent). The claim au-tarchica has not paid, said D'Alema, compared Berlusconi is not limited to hold high the banner of anti-. The recent history of recent electoral successes of the center it gives us a Knight also skillful in weaving alliances (with the UDC in Sardinia, for example). "If Berlusconi, who has the monopoly of anti-plebiscite, let's also the tools dellapolitica, there is no par-tita." Far from the center the idea of \u200b\u200bthe scon-Figge leder of the PDL with the political commercials. The left, therefore, face the left forget temptations plebiscite or velvet Old Obama-ne ("1 'idea a handsome young messiah saves us-ing is an illusion, and is also poorly Democratic") and goes back to weaving. With the left that there is (and is willing to tell a true responsibility of government and non litigious) and a center back but available to the self-l'ammicco with the moderate left. Better with a parliamentary system based on the neo-sco sistematede and former Democrat with the indispensable (but still can not say) to maintain the political credibility and maintaining the coalition. The idea that another "timber" (the European) could hurt mortally piddina instance, will consolidate the in-sum-cal perspective would owe the leader Massimo. If there is division, the offer will be reshaped party, with "la-bour Pd" to find the next great center and a more responsible ally, with Casini candidate for prime minister. In a new bipolarity which might return to the center not only a country's government, but also a stable governance finally and above all effective. Here is the 'invocazio-tion to the "recovery of cultural autonomy" mentioned by D'Alema, after the "slip-zativo organization" that has affected the first stirrings of the PD. Pierpaolo
Arzilla
from "Conquests of work "18 / 19 April 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment